Sage Sankara’s
Advaitic wisdom has been lost: people misinterpret and falsify. Advaita
is not a theory but Advaita is the rational truth, the scientific truth, and
the ultimate truth. But nobody knows it. The teachers of philosophy and the
Gurus or religion do not want to inquire into truth and have no time for it.
Sage Sankara’s
Advaitic wisdom is
nothing to do with religion. Thus, all his religious teaching which is
meant for the ignorant populace has to be bifurcated from his wisdom.
Sage Sankara is the foremost among the Sages of truth which India has produced. He
was the expounder of the Advaitic wisdom, which is the knowledge of the beyond
the form, time and space.
Sage Sankara was a Gnani for the Seekers of truth and Jagadguru for the ignorant populace
dynamic personality and a stupendous moral and spiritual force. His grasping
and elucidating powers knew no bounds. He was a great Sage and was a powerful
spiritual magnet.
Sage Sankara’s
scholarly erudition and his masterly way of exposition of intricate
philosophical problems have won the admiration of all the philosophical schools
of the world at the present moment.
Sage Sankara was an intellectual genius, a profound philosopher, an able
propagandist, a matchless preacher, a gifted poet, and a great religious
reformer. Perhaps, never in the history of any literature, a stupendous writer
like him has been found. Even the Western scholars of the present day pay their
homage and respects to him. Of all the ancient systems, that of Sage Sankara will be found to be
the most congenial and the easiest of acceptance to the modern mindset.
There is no place for a personal God (Ishvara), Sage Sankara’s wisdom because the
personal Gods imply duality. The duality is an illusion. Thus, the ideas
of personal Gods are part of the illusion; because of the curtain of ignorance
man worships personal Gods within the illusion.
Sage Sankara’s supreme Atman is Attriubuteless (without the Gunas), Nirakara
(formless), Nirvisesha (without attributes) and Akarta (non-agent). He is above
all needs and desires.
Sage Sankara:~ "This Atman is Self-evident. This Atman or Self is not established by
proofs of the existence of the Self. It is not possible to deny this Atman, for
it is the very essence of he who denies it. Atman is the basis of all kinds
of knowledge. The Self is within, the Self is without, the Self is before and
the Self is behind. The Self is on the right hand, the Self is on the left, the
Self is above and the Self is below”. Satyam-Jnanam-Anantam-Anandam is not separate
attributes. They form the very essence of Atman. Atman cannot be described
because the description implies a distinction. Atman cannot be distinguished from
any other than Atman, which is present in the form of the Spirit.
The
objective world-the world of names and forms-has no independent existence. The
Atman alone has real existence. The world is only Vyavaharika or phenomenal.
There is not one branch of knowledge that Sage Sankara has left unexplored
and which has not received the touch, polish and finish of his superhuman
intellect.
Every seeker of truth has very high reverence for Sage Sankara and his wisdom.
The loftiness, calmness, and firmness of his mind, the impartiality with which
he deals with various questions, his clearness of expression of the truth,
which is beyond the form, time and space all these make us revere the Sage Sankara more and more. His
wisdom will continue to live as long as the sun shines.
Sage Sankara taught that it was only through direct knowledge of Advaita that one
could be enlightened.
Sage Sankara's
wisdom
can be summed up in the following words: ~
Brahma Satyam Jagat Mithya,
Jeevo Brahmaiva Na Aparah
Atman alone is real; this world is unreal.
Just
as the snake is superimposed on the rope, this world in which you exist is
superimposed on the Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness.
If
one gets the knowledge of the rope, the illusion of the snake will vanish. Even
so, if one gets knowledge of the Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness, the world in which you exists will become unreal.
Remember
Sage Sankara is Jagadguru for
the ignorant populace and Brahma Gnani for the seeking world.
Sage Sankara’s wisdom is nothing
to do orthodox belief systems. Sage Sri, Sankara is the only sage who has final
authority on the Advaitic truth. The Advaitic truth is rational truth and
scientific truth without dogma.
Religion is nothing to do with Advaita. Advaitic sect belongs to
religion. Advaita is pure spirituality. Advaitic sect is dualistic is nothing
to do with the Advaitic truth which is hidden by the illusion. Mixing religion
and spirituality is like mixing oil and water.
Religion
is regarded as sacred and real by the common people, by the wise as false and
by the politicians as useful.
The
religion and its sects are based on the form, time, and space whereas the
Spirituality is based on the Atman the formless, timeless and spaceless
existence.
Religions
hold the birth, life, death and the world as a reality. From the ultimate
standpoint, the world in which we exist is an illusion created out the Soul,
which is present in the form of consciousness.
The
seeker must know the difference between religion and spirituality. Many
people think the religion itself as spirituality. Spirituality leads to
discovering the truth which is hidden by the form, time, and space.
Advaita
is universal. Advaita is the nature of the Soul, the Self. The world
in which you exist is created out of single stuff. That single stuff is
consciousness. Knowledge of the single stuff is Advaitic wisdom.
Sage Sankara’s
wisdom is nothing to do with the orthodox belief systems. Some
philosophers in the past dissented from this interpretation of Vedanta
philosophy, holding that the incarnated Souls were separate from the Divine
Essence and only finally merged with it after the cycles of birth.
All
these theoretical philosophies are based on the imagination based on the false
‘Self’ (ego or you) within the false experience (waking).
Orthodox people argue that Sage Sankara had a Guru. Sage Sankara
himself’ was Guru.
Yes, for orthodox
people he is Jagadguru but for the seeker of truth, he is a Brahma Gnani.
Sage Sankara gave religious, ritual or dogmatic instruction to the ignorant populace
but Advaitic wisdom only to the few who could rise to it. Hence the
interpretation of his writings by commentators is often confusing because they
mix up the two viewpoints. Thus, they may assert that ritual is a means of
realizing Brahman, which is absurd.
The
traditionally religious people are so entangled in orthodox religiosity; it is
very difficult for them to free themselves from narrow-minded prejudices and dogmas
and superstitions. These educated orthodox people are more ignorant than
illiterate. They strongly stuck to their inherited orthodox baggage meant for
the ignorant populace. Even though their own Sage has said that orthodoxy meant
for the ignorant populace they ignore and they are like blind led by another
blind follow the inherited blind belief.
Even Swami Vivekananda was Ramakrishna Paramahansa's disciple. Swami Vivekananda
himself’ said: ~ “You have to grow from the inside out. None can teach you; none can make
you spiritual. There is no other teacher, but your own Soul.”
There are two kinds of audiences - the ordinary ones who desire the
transitory heaven and other pleasures obtained as a result of ritual
sacrifices, and the more advanced seeker who seeks to know the ultimate truth
or Brahman. The Guru and Guru paramparas are meant for the first audience, to
help lead its followers along the way. However, there is no need to follow any
parampara and follow any Guru those who wish to realize the truth which is
beyond the form, time, and space. We should not mix religion with spirituality
because the religion is based on the ego and spirituality is based on the Soul.
The religion is concerned with its paramparas, not truth whereas spirituality is concerned only with the truth, which is beyond the form, time,
and space. Religion is not spirituality.
Sage Sankara: ~ "Though I wear these robes of a Sanyasin, it is only for the
sake of bread." (Select
Works of Sage Sankara" also his commentary on Brihad)
Thus,
the above passage proves that all those who were the sanyasin robes are wearing
it for the sake of bread belongs to the religion; they are nothing to do with
the ‘Self’-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana. There is no need to
criticize and condemn the Gurus, yogis, and swamis because they are needed for
the welfare of ignorant mass in the dualistic world.
So,
he wore a Guru's robe only for the sake the ignorant. So he was identified as
Guru with parampara by religious people. For the truth seekers, Sage Sri,
Sankara is a Brahma Gnani.
Sage Sankara gave
out what was of most use to the greatest number of people. Therefore, in the
commentaries on the Upanishads, such as the Manduka, he gave the highest the nondual message of the identity of Atman and Brahman, revitalizing the
philosophy and practice of Advaita, while in the commentaries on the
Brahmasutra he gave lesser teaching, positing both higher and lower Maya and
higher and lower Brahman (Ishvara) to explain creation for those of lesser
intellects until they were ready for the highest truth.
Sage Sankara: ~Knower of the Atman (A Gnani) "bears no outward mark of a holy man." Viveka Chudamani (2) -Stanza
539.
When
Sage Sankara says the Knower of the Atman (A
Gnani) "bears no outward mark of a holy man.
Thus,
it proves that the religious Gurus and yogis are not Gnanis, because, they
identified themselves as holy people.
On
Advaitic perspective, A Gnani never identifies himself’ as a Guru or a Yogi or
someone disciple. The one who accepts himself as a Guru or someone’s disciple
is not a Gnani.
For
the seekers of truth need not identify Sage Sankara as a holy man or
Jagadguru but a Brahma Gnani.
Ashtavakra
Samhita: ~
"The man of
knowledge (Gnani), though living like an ordinary man, is contrary to him and
only those like him understand his statement.
All
the Guru Parampara is for the religious people. There is no need for a Guru who
wants to tread the path of wisdom.
The
Guru is useless so long as the ultimate truth is unknown, and Guru is equally
useless when the ultimate truth or Brahman has already been known.
A
Guru is needed in religious and the yogic path. There is no need of a Guru to
acquire ‘Self’-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.: ~ Santthosh Kumaar